Section 5.1 Linearization
Subsection 5.1.1 Equilibrium Solutions
One of the most useful methods of determining the nature of an equilibrium solution for a given nonlinear system is to approximate the nonlinear system with a linear system. More specifically, an equilibrium solution occurs for the linear systemExample 5.1.1.
Consider the system
From
we can quickly conclude that the only equilibrium solution to the system is (0, 0)\text{.} The phase portrait for this system is given in Figure 5.1.2. If we have the initial conditions x(0) = 1 and y(0) = 1\text{,} we can see that the solution tends toward the origin as t \to \infty\text{.} However, it is unclear from the phase portrait if the solution curves of all initial value problems with initial conditions near the origin tend towards the equilibrium solution as t \to \infty\text{.}

Since the nonlinear terms of the system do not contribute much towards dx/dt and dy/dt for values of x and y near zero, we can determining the nature of the equilibrium solution by examining the system consisting of only linear terms on the right-hand side of the equation,
The matrix for this linear system,
has eigenvalues \lambda = -1 and \mu = -2 with eigenvectors \mathbf u = (3,2) and \mathbf v = (1,1)\text{,} respectively. The general solution for this linear system is
This indeed suggests that solutions near the origin tend towards the origin as t \to \infty\text{.} In this case, we say that the equilibrium solution is stable. Of course, if we are given an initial condition such as x(0) = -0.5 and y(0) = 1\text{.}
Example 5.1.3. A Competing Species Model.
Suppose that x and y are the population of two distinct species that compete for the same resources. For example, two species of fish may compete for the same food in a lake or sheep and cattle competing for the same grazing land. Recall from Section 2.2 that we can model two competing species using the following system of first-order differential equations,
The first term in each equation is the logistic growth of each species. The second term in each equation tells how each species is affected by interacting with the competing species.
More specifically, let us consider the following system,
It is easy to see that the four equilibrium solutions: (0,0)\text{,} (0,3)\text{,} (2,0)\text{,} and (1, 1)\text{.} We can view the direction field, the phase plane, and some solution curves for this system in Figure 5.1.4.

Let us analyze what happens at the equilibrium solution (1, 1)\text{.} If we decide on an appropriate change of variables, we can translate the entire system so that this equilibrium solution is at the origin. If we let
then
Equations (5.1.1) and (5.1.2) now become
As before we consider only the linear part of equations (5.1.4) and (5.1.4) are
The idea is that the linear part is a good local approximation to the original equations much like a tangent line is a good local approximation to a smooth function in calculus. We can determine the local nature of the equilibrium solution by examining the eigenvalues of the matrix
The eigenvalues of A are \lambda = -1 + \sqrt{2} = 0.4142 and \mu = -1 - \sqrt{2} \approx -2.4142 with eigenvectors \mathbf u = (1,\sqrt{2}\,) \approx (1, 1.4142) and \mathbf v = (1,-\sqrt{2}\,) \approx (1, -1.4142)\text{,} respectively. The solution to the linear system is now
or
If we have initial conditions x(0) = 3 and y(0) = 4\text{,} one can quickly determine that c_1 = 3/2 + \sqrt{2} \approx 2.9142 and c_2 = 3/2 - \sqrt{2} \approx 0.0859\text{,} and equations (5.1.7) and (5.1.8) become
As t \to \infty notice that both x(t) and y(t) become very large and tend away from the origin.
We can conclude that the equilibrium solution (1,1) is unstable. That is, tend away from the equilibrium solution as t \to \infty if one population begins with a slight advantage over the other. If neither popluation has an initial advantage over the other, then the solution curve will approach the equilibrium solution as t \to \infty\text{.}
Example 5.1.5. A Nonpolynomial Example.
If systems such as the following can be approximated by linear systems,
Certainly, this sytems has an equilibrium solution at (0,0)\text{.} We can expand \sin x into a power series,
Thus, this system can be approximated by the linear system


Example 5.1.8.
For example, consider the system
The x and y-nullclines of this system are the curves y = x^2 - 4x + 4 and y = x^3\text{,} respectively. Since the two nullclines intersect only at (1, 1)\text{,} we have a single equilibrium solution. From the phase plane, it appears that (1, 1) is a stable equilibrium solution. That is, all solution curves starting sufficiently close to (1, 1) will approach the equilibrium solution as t \to \infty (Figure 5.1.9).

Making the substitution u = x - 1 and v = y - 1\text{,} simply translates the entire system to the origin, and we obtain the system
Our new system has u and v-nullclines v = u(u - 2) and v = u(u^2 + 3u + 3)\text{,} respectively. Notice that we have simply moved the phase portrait of the original system so that our equilibrium solution is now at the origin. Furthermore, we can approximate the u and v-nullclines by their tangent lines v = -2u and v = 3u\text{,} respectively. From Figure 5.1.9, it appears that we are approximating our original system with a linear system.

Example 5.1.11.
In Example 5.1.8, we considered the system
The Jacobian matrix of this system is
For the equilibrium solution (1, 1)\text{,}
Since J has eigenvalues \lambda = (-3 \pm i \sqrt{11})/2\text{,} the equilibrium solution will act as a spiral sink for initial values close to (1,1)\text{.}
Activity 5.1.1. Classifying Equilibrium Solutions for Nonlinear Systems.
Find all of the nullclines and equilbrium solutions for each of the following systems. Classify each equilibrium solution as stable or unstable. Plot the nullclines and a direction field for each system. 29 
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Subsection 5.1.2 When Linearization Fails
There are at least two cases when linearization does not give us the information that we seek. First, it might well be the case that the linear terms vanish in the nonlinear system. For example, the system
Subsection 5.1.3 Important Lessons
- We can approximate a nonlinear system\begin{align*} x'(t) \amp = f(x,y)\\ y'(t) \amp = g(x, y) \end{align*}near each equilibrium point (x_0, y_0) with a linear system by using a Taylor series approximation for f and g\text{.} The matrix of our linear approximation,\begin{equation*} J = \begin{pmatrix} f_x(x_0, y_0) \amp f_y(x_0, y_0) \\ g_x(x_0, y_0) \amp g_y(x_0, y_0) \end{pmatrix}, \end{equation*}is the Jacobian matrix of the system. We can classify nonlinear systems by examining the Jacobian matrix of the system and using the trace-determinant plane.
- Linearization only tells us how solutions behave near the equilibrium point. A solution curve might behave quite differently if it is far away from the equilibrium solution.
- In some cases, linearization can fail.
Exercises 5.1.4 Exercises
Linearization
For each of the systems in Exercise Group 5.1.4.1–6,
- Plot and label the nullclines for equation in the system.
- Find all of the equilibrium solutions for the system.
- Use the Jacobian to classify each equilibrium solution (spiral source, nodal sink, etc.).
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Consider the following three systems
- \begin{align*} x' & = 3 \sin x + y\\ y' & = 4x + \cos y - 1 \end{align*}
- \begin{align*} x' & = -3 \sin x + y\\ y' & = 4x + \cos y - 1 \end{align*}
- \begin{align*} x' & = -3 \sin x + y\\ y' & = 4x + 3\cos y - 3 \end{align*}
All three systems have an equilibrium solution at (0, 0)\text{.} Which two systems have phase portraits with the same ``local picture'' near (0, 0)\text{?} Justify your answer.
8.
Let us consider an epidemic model for a city. We make the following additional assumptions about our model.
- The city has a constant birth rate rate of \alpha persons per day. All new born babies are susceptible to the disease.
- Infected people either recover or die after a certain number of days. If an individual recovers, he or she is immune.
If we let S(t) be the number of susceptible individuals at time t and I(t) be the number of infected individuals at time t\text{,} our assumptions give rise to the following system of differential equations,
The constant \alpha is determined by the probability of an interaction between a susceptible individual and an infected individual, and \gamma is the rate at which infected individuals are removed from the population. If
then both the susceptible and infected populations do not change. This will occur at
We are interested in the behavior of solutions near (S_0, I_0)\text{.} If solutions approach this equilbrium point, then the disease will become endemic to the population.
9.
Consider the predator-prey system modeled by the following equations,
Find the equilibrium solutions of this system.
What are the eigenvalues of the Jacobian for each equilibrium solution?
What, if anything, can be said about the nature of the equilibrium solutions of the system?